Trump’s DOJ to Drop Charges Against Michael Flynn, Who Pled Guilty Twice

The decision still has to be approved by a federal judge.

Michael Flynn leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on June 24, 2019.Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Justice Department has moved to drop its criminal case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who pled guilty in late 2017 to lying to the FBI.

The remarkable move follows sustained public pressure from President Donald Trump, who claimed Flynn was unfairly targeted for political purposes, and behind-the-scenes efforts at the Justice Department by Attorney General William Barr, who commissioned an outside review of the case and put pressure on Flynn’s prosecutors.

In a court filing Thursday, US Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy Shea, who has taken over the case, argued that Flynn’s lies were not “material” to any investigation, a standard legally required for prosecution. “Because the Government does not have a substantial federal interest in penalizing a defendant for a crime that it is not satisfied occurred, and that it does not believe it can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the Government now moves to dismiss the criminal information,” Shea wrote.

The decision to drop the Flynn case, which must still be approved by US District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan, appears to be the latest instance of Barr exerting pressure within DOJ to undermine frontline prosecutors who have advanced cases embarrassing to the president. In February, Barr forced prosecutors to lower a sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone, a longtime Trump adviser, just hours after Trump complained in an early morning tweet that Stone’s original sentence suggested by prosecutors was too harsh. Following that intervention, prosecutors who brought the Stone case forward withdrew in protest.

In February, pressure from Barr also appears to have caused Flynn prosecutors to lower a sentencing recommendation in his case. The lead prosecutor in Flynn’s case, Brandon Van Grack, a former member of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, withdrew from the case Thursday, shortly before the Justice Department announced it was dropping charges. Van Grack remains head of DOJ’s Foreign Agents Registration Act Unit, which regulates for foreign interests in the United States.

The Justice Department’s action Thursday drew quick denunciation of Barr by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who decried “the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history.”

In a statement, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a liberal watchdog group, said Barr “has consistently acted for the personal and political benefit of President Trump.” The group said it is “deeply skeptical that this is anything other than a further capturing of our criminal justice system for the benefit of the president. The president doesn’t need to issue pardons to his cronies when his attorney general appears willing to terminate their cases before justice can be served.”

Flynn, an Army lieutenant general, served as head of Defense Intelligence Agency under President Obama but was forced out of the post in 2014 amid complaints about his management and erratic behavior. During the presidential campaign in 2016, Flynn became an ardent Trump backer. In November 2016, Flynn was revealed to have secretly agreed to lobby for Turkey while advising Trump. The newly elected president picked Flynn as his National Security Adviser anyway.

Flynn quickly faced additional problem when he was caught secretly conferring about US sanctions on Russia with the Kremlin’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, during the presidential transition period. Questioned in January 2017 by the FBI about these conversations, Flynn denied discussing sanctions, a claim he later admitted was a lie. Flynn resigned as National Security Adviser on February 13, after just weeks on the job.

In November 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI and agreed to cooperate with Mueller, becoming the first senior Trump aide to flip. As part of his plea deal, Flynn admitted that he had lied to the FBI about his conversations with Kislyak, and that he also had lied to agents about his efforts to influence foreign diplomats regarding a December 2016 UN resolution condemning Israeli settlement construction. He also admitted that he had lied to the Justice Department in a Foreign Agents Registration Act filing by claiming he was not aware he was lobbying for Turkey.

In June 2019,  Flynn reversed course, replacing the attorney who negotiated his plea deal with Sidney Powell, a Fox News pundit and vociferous critic of the Mueller probe. Powell wrote secretly to Barr, asking that DOJ drop the Flynn case, or short of that, requested “the appointment of new government counsel with no connection to the Special Counsel team of attorneys or agents to conduct review of the entire Flynn case.”

Powell filed a slew of motions alleging prosecutorial misconduct. With her encouragement, Flynn began flirting with adherents of the bizarre Q-Anon conspiracy theory. He agreed to speak a Q-Anon conference but withdrew after Mother Jones reported on his plans. In December, Sullivan rejected Powell’s motions in a stinging ruling, even calling her arguments baseless and irrelevant to Flynn’s case. Sullivan accused Powell of plagiarism in her filings.

Powell then shifted tactics. Though she had previously told Sullivan she had no plans to reverse Flynn’s guilty plea, in January she began legal efforts to do just that.

In February, Barr appointed prosecutors in the office of Jeff Jensen, US Attorney in St. Louis, a Trump appointee, along with DOJ prosecutors in Washington, to review Flynn’s case. This review resulted in the government producing new material that Flynn’s backers touted as exculpatory. Last week, prosecutors disclosed in court filings handwritten notes that Bill Priestap, then the FBI’s head of counterintelligence, had made before FBI agents interviewed Flynn at the White House in January 2016. Preistap wrote: “What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” Experienced prosecutors said that the FBI’s tactics with Flynn were not unusual, but Trump and conservative media pundits touted the disclosure as major news that proved Flynn had been railroaded by the FBI. The move to drop the Flynn case suggests that Justice Department leadership thought so too. 

Read prosecutors’ motion withdrawing the Flynn case:



Flynn Motion to Dismiss (Text)

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate